Be Wary And Wise When Seeking Reconstructive Surgery

Leave a reply

Patients do not shop for the right health care provider based on price, this definitely should not be aiming for one who is going to charge the lowest rate. Instead, consider qualifications, expertise, experience, credentials so that the doctor will do a good job assisting the patient. When looking for credible surgeons begin by asking for recommendations from individuals whose opinions are trusted. Here is are some other helpful tips.

Some patients choose to go abroad to seek reconstructive surgery, this is done in order to save money, but it could lead to other problems. Be wary. Many are tempted by the price offered abroad as they can be considerably lower, but you may be giving up many rights once on foreign soil.

Budgeting matters on many levels with reconstructive surgery. Hospital visits, exams, and leave from work should be considered. Consider how much you are willing to, and able to, afford. Stick to numbers easy for you to cover. Only spend within your means. Procedures are expensive, but many can be within your budget.

Consultation is as important in reconstructive surgery as in any other medical procedure. Always ask for a consultation. During a consultation is a good time to ask important questions and discuss your personal needs.

 Medical Assessments may be needed before undergoing any surgery, proper assessments must be done. Always have a complete physical done as well as making note of any medical issues.

Ask for Credentials from any provider visited or contacted. Where did this provider study? Where did this provider intern? What papers, certifications can be provided? Is the provider licensed? Board certified in your state? How many years has this provider been in practice?

Whatever type of surgery or procedure you are going in for, always be aware of the risks involved. Also take time to consider your recovery period and any needs you may have after the procedure is complete.

Breast Augmentation: Part Three

Leave a reply

Breast Augmentation Evaluation

Breast Augmentation in Las Vegas

When a patient is considering breast augmentation surgery that is not for reconstructive purposes, a psychological evaluation may be suggested. This is in no way meant to be offensive to the patient. It may not be suggested, but if the breast augmentation evaluation is suggested along with the many other medical evaluations, it is for the benefit of the patient.

Some breast augmentation patients are young women with a personality profile that may indicate some form of psychological distress surrounding her personal appearance and her bodily self-image. There may be a history of having endured criticism or teasing about the aesthetics of her person. In studies surrounding body image concerns of breast augmentation on patients as well as studies on body dysmorphic disorder in regards to cosmetic surgery, there have been reports that women who underwent breast augmentation surgery also had undergone some amount of psychotherapy. These women may also have suffered low self-esteem. Some patients may also present frequent occurrences of psychological depression or suffer body dysmorphia.

A post-operative patient survey may ask about mental health and quality-of-life. Many women with the aforementioned body and esteem issues may report improved physical health, physical appearance, social life, self-confidence, self-esteem, and satisfactory sexual functioning. Furthermore, some women may report long-term satisfaction with breast implant outcomes; some despite having suffered medical complications that required surgical revision, either corrective or aesthetic. If you have any questions on this or are ready to schedule your consultation, please contact us today at 702.410.9800.

.

breast reconstruction - Silicone gel-filled breast implants

Silicone Gel Implants: Part Two

Leave a reply

Silicone Gel Implants – Part 2

Silicone gel-filled breast implants

In the last article, the use of saline breast implants was discussed. The first two generations of this type of breast augmentation implant were described in a bit more detail. In this article, the fourth and fifth generations of the silicone gel implant will be discussed.

In the 1980s, models of the Third and of the Fourth generations of breast implant devices were sequential advances in manufacturing technology, such as elastomer-coated shells that decreased gel-bleed, this is the filler leakage, and a thicker increased-cohesion filler gel.

Sociologically, the manufacturers of prosthetic breasts then designed and made anatomic models of the natural breast and shaped models of round and tapered, that realistically corresponded with the breast and body types of women. The tapered models of breast implant have a uniformly textured surface, which reduces the rotation of the prosthesis within the implant pocket. Round models of breast implant are available in smooth-surface- and textured-surface- types.

Since the mid-1990s, the Fifth generation of silicone-gel breast implant is made of a semi-solid gel that mostly eliminates the occurrences of filler leakage and of the migration of the silicone filler from the implant-pocket to elsewhere in the woman’s body.  Studies of this fifth generation report low incidence rates of capsular contracture and of device-shell rupture; and greater rates of improved medical-safety and technical-efficacy than that of early generation breast implant devices.  For more information about breast implants and breast augmentation, please clink on this link.

Click this link to go to read Silicon Breast Implants-Part 1.

Silicone Breast Implants: Part One

Leave a reply

Silicone Breast Implants – Part 1

Las Vegas Breast Implants

As a medical device, there are five generations of silicone breast implants, each defined by common model-manufacturing techniques.

The modern prosthetic breast was invented in 1961, by the American reconstructive surgeons Thomas Cronin and Frank Gerow. The first augmentation mammoplasty was performed in 1962. There are five generations of the breast implant model types that are filled with silicone gel; each generation of breast prosthesis is defined by common model-manufacturing techniques.

The Cronin–Gerow Implant, prosthesis model 1963, was a silicone rubber envelope-sac, shaped like a teardrop, which was filled with viscous silicone-gel. To reduce the rotation of the emplaced breast implant upon the chest wall, the model 1963 prosthesis was affixed to the implant pocket with a fastener-patch, made of Dacron material which was attached to the rear of the breast implant shell. In the 1970s, manufacturers presented the second generation of breast implant prostheses that featured functional developments and aesthetic improvements to the technology:

The first technological developments were a thinner-gauge device-shell, and a filler gel of low-cohesion silicone, which improved the functionality and the size, appearance, and texture of the silicone-gel breast implant. Yet, in clinical practice, second-generation breast implants proved fragile, and suffered greater incidences of shell rupture, and of filler leakage through the intact device shell. The consequent, increased incidence-rates of medical complications precipitated faulty-product.

The second technological development was a polyurethane foam coating for the shell of the breast implant; the coating reduced the incidence of capsular contracture, by causing an inflammatory reaction that impeded the formation of a capsule of fibrous collagen tissue around the breast implant. Nevertheless, despite that prophylactic measure, the medical use of polyurethane-coated breast implants was briefly discontinued, because of the potential health-risk posed by a carcinogenic by-product of the chemical breakdown of the polyurethane foam coating of the breast implant.

After reviewing the medical data, TDA-induced breast cancer was an infinitesimal health-risk to women with breast implants and did not justify legally requiring physicians to explain the matter to their patients.

The third technological development was the double lumen breast implant device, a double-cavity prosthesis composed of a silicone breast implant contained within a saline breast implant. The two-fold, technical goal. The cosmetic benefits of silicone-gel enclosed in saline solution. A breast implant device the volume of which is post-operatively adjustable. Nevertheless, the more complex design of the double-lumen breast implant suffered a device-failure rate greater than that of single-lumen breast implants.

Click Here for Part 2 of this series

Types of Breast Implants: Part One (Saline Breast Implant)

Leave a reply

Breast augmentation and breast reconstruction use breast implants to enhance the aesthetic size, shape, and texture of breasts.  These procedures are offered with the use of three types of breast implant devices. The next three articles will discuss in some depth these three types of devices.

The Saline Breast Implant

Breast Implants

Implants filled with a saline solution that essentially contains a biological-concentration of salt water. This form of implant was first manufactured in France. The saline breast implant was introduced for use as a prosthetic medical device in mid 1960s. Contemporary models of saline breast implants are manufactured with thicker walls of room-temperature vulcanized shells made of a silicone elastomer. Studies report that rates of deflation due to filler leakage of the pre-filled saline breast implant made it a second-choice prosthesis for corrective breast surgery. The saline breast implant was in the past, the prosthesis most used for breast augmentation surgery. This is because of the U.S. FDA’s restrictions against importation of silicone-filled breast implants.

The goal of the saline-implant technology is based on a need for a physically less invasive surgical technique for placing an empty breast-implant device through a smaller surgical incision. After the empty breast implants are inserted into the implant pockets, the surgeon then fills each device with the saline solution. Because required incisions are short and small, the resulting scars are much smaller and shorter than surgical scars required for inserting silicone-gel implants.

The saline implant can yield good-to-excellent results of increased breast-size, smoother hemisphere-contour, and a realistic texture. It can however be a cause of some cosmetic problems, such as rippling and wrinkling of breast-envelope skin however. Some technical issues, such as the presence of the implant being noticeable to the eye and touch may also occur. Such cosmetic problems are more likely the case of woman with very little breast tissue or in the case of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. The silicone-gel implant is a technically superior prosthetic device for breast augmentation and breast reconstruction in these cases. A patient with more breast tissue, sub-muscular emplacement is the recommended surgical approach and saline breast implants can afford an aesthetic result similar to silicone breast implants. For more information, please call us at 702.410.9800 or click on this link for Part Two of this series called  Silicone Gel Implants.